Information Showing that Nuclear Energy is the Most Reliable Clean Energy Source is Surprising and Changes Attitudes
Our 2025 survey tested the impact of information that showed graphically the capacity factors of four clean energy sources: hydropower, nuclear, wind, and solar energy.
Awareness and Appeal of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs): 2025 Update (Insights from Surveys of the U.S. Public and Nuclear Power Plant Neighbors)
One of the most intriguing innovations is the Small Modular Reactor (SMR). SMRs produce less electricity than the large plants operating today, of which there are more than 90 in more than 50 locations across the United States. However, SMRs can be built in series much more quickly and at lower cost. According to the Nuclear Energy Agency of OECD, the number of SMR designs being readied for market has reached 127.
Republicans, Democrats, and Independents: Views on Clean Air and Climate Change
The 2025 National Nuclear Energy Public Opinion Survey probed differences between Republicans, Democrats, and Independents regarding 1) the importance they give to electricity that brings clean air and a climate change solution, 2) their association of nuclear energy with clean air and climate change solution, and 3) the impact of information showing that nuclear is the most reliable clean energy.
Analysis shows that clean air continues to be a valuable but not well-known asset of nuclear energy for Americans of different political persuasions.
More Informed, More Favorable
One of the reasons why so many Americans take middle positions on nuclear energy is that they don’t feel very well informed about this energy source. In 2025, only 15% said they feel very well informed on the topic, 47% somewhat well informed, 31% not too well informed, and 7% not at all well informed. Whether or not their self-assessments are accurate, they are important. Feeling informed about a subject is a prerequisite for strong opinions and likely action.
Perception Gap Persists
A perception gap still exists. Many people think that community opinion about nuclear energy is less favorable than their own. Respondents are about evenly divided on whether the majority of people in their community favor or oppose nuclear energy; 52% perceived that a majority in their community favored nuclear energy, whereas 72% personally favored nuclear energy. That’s a 20-point gap.
2025 National Nuclear Energy Public Opinion Survey: U.S. Public Support for Nuclear Energy Remains High
The 2025 National Nuclear Energy Public Opinion Survey finds continued highly favorable public opinion of nuclear energy, despite a slight drop since 2024. Four decades ago, the numbers for favor and oppose were about even. Those who strongly favor nuclear energy outnumber those who strongly oppose by 5 to 1.
Understanding and Bridging the Gender Gap
National Nuclear Public Opinion Surveys by Bisconti Research show the percentage of women and men who favored nuclear energy from 1983 to 2024. The trend lines show women and men following a similar path but with women consistently less favorable. Both paths have trended upward since 1983—for men from 63% favor to 85% favor (+22), for women from 43% favor to 70% favor (+27).
Slides You Can Use
Highlights from the 2024 National Nuclear Energy Public Opinion Survey.
Record High Support for Nuclear Energy
The 2024 National Nuclear Energy Public Opinion Survey shows that favorable public opinion of nuclear energy continues at a record high. For four years in a row, more than three-fourths of the U.S public said that they favored the use of nuclear energy. That is a sea change from four decades ago, when the public was about evenly divided between those who favored nuclear energy and those who were opposed.
What Does the Public Value in Electricity Development?
In talking about energy sources, the most meaningful discussion links to public values.
Knowledge vs. Facts
The 2024 National Nuclear Energy Public Opinion Survey tested public knowledge on nuclear energy topics. Most respondents failed the test. When shown facts that corrected these misperceptions, respondents found the information to be new and surprising and—important. The study points the way to addressing the large knowledge gaps that persist.
Knowledge vs. Facts: Clean Air
Nuclear energy’s essential role as a major source of clean energy is increasingly recognized internationally and in the United States, but the U.S. public has not yet caught up with world leaders. Clean air is one of the most valued considerations in electricity production. However, only 18 percent in this survey knew that nuclear energy emits no air pollution or, arguably, a tiny amount.
Knowledge vs. Facts: Nuclear Energy Contribution
The magnitude of nuclear energy’s contribution in the United States and worldwide is not widely known. Given this poor knowledge and severe underestimation of nuclear energy’s contribution, respondents found facts on the topic both surprising and important.
Knowledge vs. Facts: Radiation
Radiation is an underlying concern when people think about nuclear energy. The stigma of radiation persists over the years. In 2024, only 17 percent correctly identified nuclear energy as the way one receives the least radiation (out of four possible sources of radiation).
Knowledge vs. Facts: Regulatory Oversight and Safety
Safety is a top public concern, and this concern is mitigated by information about controls—how nuclear power plants are kept safe. These controls include physical barriers and regulatory oversight. The 2024 survey found that only 18 percent of respondents were aware that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) monitors each nuclear power plant every day. That fact was surprising and judged highly important, as was information about physical barriers.
Knowledge vs. Facts: Reliability and Efficiency
Reliability is one of the top two considerations for the way electricity is produced, and a large majority of the public also views efficiency as extremely or very important. Many people do not know that nuclear energy meets both these considerations by operating more than 90 percent of the time. Although nuclear energy is seen as one of the most reliable and efficient sources of energy, only one-third of respondents gave nuclear a rating of 9-10 on these two characteristics.
Knowledge vs. Facts: Waste
One of the barriers to effective communications about nuclear waste (used nuclear fuel) is that most of the public cannot visualize what is being discussed. In 2024, only 26 percent imagined it as something solid and only 32 percent as something small and safely contained. Respondents found information about waste both surprising and important. One fact described the waste and how it is safely contained. Another explained that the technology exists to recycle nuclear waste for beneficial uses.
National Nuclear Energy Public Opinion Survey 2024: Questionnaire
Questionnaire for National Nuclear Energy Public Opinion Survey 2024. Online survey of 1,000 nationally representative U.S. adults April 30-May 2, 2024. Margin of error is plus or minus three percentage points.
December 2023: Slides You Can Use
Highlights from the 2023 National Nuclear Energy Public Opinion Survey and the 2022 National Nuclear Power Plant Neighbors Public Opinion Survey. See also the blog post Reverse NIMBY: Nuclear Power Plant Neighbors Say “Yes”
Slides You Can Use
Highlights from the 2023 National Nuclear Energy Public Opinion Survey.